<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rubyists Receive an Amazing Present This Month</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danielfischer.com/2007/12/03/rubyists-receive-an-amazing-present-this-month/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danielfischer.com/2007/12/03/rubyists-receive-an-amazing-present-this-month/</link>
	<description>Ruby, Ruby on Rails, Los Angeles, Technology, Geek, Science, Life</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chu Yeow</title>
		<link>http://www.danielfischer.com/2007/12/03/rubyists-receive-an-amazing-present-this-month/#comment-16890</link>
		<dc:creator>Chu Yeow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielfischer.com/2007/12/03/rubyists-receive-an-amazing-present-this-month/#comment-16890</guid>
		<description>Yeah it's me again ;)

Here's the Ruby 1.9 compatibility ticket for your enjoyment :) - http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/1689</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah it&#8217;s me again ;)</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the Ruby 1.9 compatibility ticket for your enjoyment :) - <a href="http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/1689" rel="nofollow">http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/1689</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chu Yeow</title>
		<link>http://www.danielfischer.com/2007/12/03/rubyists-receive-an-amazing-present-this-month/#comment-16795</link>
		<dc:creator>Chu Yeow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 07:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielfischer.com/2007/12/03/rubyists-receive-an-amazing-present-this-month/#comment-16795</guid>
		<description>There're "still failing tests in Rails 2.0" when run against trunk builds of Ruby 1.9 is what I actually meant to write.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;re &#8220;still failing tests in Rails 2.0&#8243; when run against trunk builds of Ruby 1.9 is what I actually meant to write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chu Yeow</title>
		<link>http://www.danielfischer.com/2007/12/03/rubyists-receive-an-amazing-present-this-month/#comment-16794</link>
		<dc:creator>Chu Yeow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 07:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielfischer.com/2007/12/03/rubyists-receive-an-amazing-present-this-month/#comment-16794</guid>
		<description>Well, I've been watching the Rails Trac timeline recently (it's what I do when I get bored and when submitting patches) so I know of the 1.9 compat stuff that's been done by Jeremy Kemper, but as far as I can see with the recent trunk builds of Ruby 1.9, there are still failing tests.

I'm not complaining, just stating what I think is a fact :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ve been watching the Rails Trac timeline recently (it&#8217;s what I do when I get bored and when submitting patches) so I know of the 1.9 compat stuff that&#8217;s been done by Jeremy Kemper, but as far as I can see with the recent trunk builds of Ruby 1.9, there are still failing tests.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not complaining, just stating what I think is a fact :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Fisch...</title>
		<link>http://www.danielfischer.com/2007/12/03/rubyists-receive-an-amazing-present-this-month/#comment-16540</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fisch...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 08:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielfischer.com/2007/12/03/rubyists-receive-an-amazing-present-this-month/#comment-16540</guid>
		<description>If I'm not mistaken, Rails 2.0 was built with Ruby 1.9 compatibility in mind. I don't think there is a need to fear.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m not mistaken, Rails 2.0 was built with Ruby 1.9 compatibility in mind. I don&#8217;t think there is a need to fear.</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chu Yeow</title>
		<link>http://www.danielfischer.com/2007/12/03/rubyists-receive-an-amazing-present-this-month/#comment-16538</link>
		<dc:creator>Chu Yeow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 08:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielfischer.com/2007/12/03/rubyists-receive-an-amazing-present-this-month/#comment-16538</guid>
		<description>Yep can't wait to run my Rails apps on ruby 1.9. I think there'll be a need to be a period where Rails gets updated for 1.9 compatibility though so it probably won't work with 1.9 from the get go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep can&#8217;t wait to run my Rails apps on ruby 1.9. I think there&#8217;ll be a need to be a period where Rails gets updated for 1.9 compatibility though so it probably won&#8217;t work with 1.9 from the get go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
